guard: be in legend called

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security guard
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.61
, position
Weight: 0.61
, servant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rip
Weight: 0.51
, across
Weight: 0.42
, west berlin
Weight: 0.36
, cornerback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in legend called 1.00
be in legend 0.98
be declaired as hero 0.77
become real hero 0.76
become hero 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(person, be declaired as hero)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(guard, be in legend called)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(person, be declaired as hero)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(person, be declaired as hero)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(person, be declaired as hero)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(guard, be in legend called)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(guard, be in legend called)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(guard, be in legend)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(guard, be in legend)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(guard, be in legend)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in legend)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in legend called)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(guard, be in legend called)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(person, be declaired as hero)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(guard, be in legend called)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(person, be declaired as hero)