guitar: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stringed instrument
Weight: 0.74
, bass guitar
Weight: 0.72
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.67
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.66
, album
Weight: 0.65
Siblings banjo
Weight: 0.65
, violin
Weight: 0.60
, acoustic guitar
Weight: 0.42
, electric guitar
Weight: 0.41
, mandolin
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
is superior 0.79
has quality price 0.79
get better with age 0.78
has quality joke 0.77
sound better with age 0.77
is best 0.76
is great high 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bass guitar, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(guitar, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(guitar, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bass guitar, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bass guitar, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violin, get better with age)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(violin, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(violin, sound better with age)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, sound better with age)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(violin, is superior)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(violin, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bass guitar, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(guitar, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(violin, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(violin, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(violin, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(violin, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(violin, is superior)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(violin, is superior)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(violin, get better with age)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(violin, get better with age)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(violin, sound better with age)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(violin, sound better with age)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, sound better with age)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, sound better with age)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(guitar, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(guitar, get better with age)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(guitar, get better with age)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(guitar, sound better with age)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(guitar, sound better with age)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(guitar, get better with age)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(guitar, sound better with age)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(guitar, get better with age)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(guitar, sound better with age)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(guitar, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bass guitar, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(violin, sound better with age)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(violin, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(violin, get better with age)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(violin, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, sound better with age)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(violin, is superior)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(guitar, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bass guitar, has quality good)