gum: be at trash

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shellac
Weight: 0.44
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate
Weight: 0.34
, candy cane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at trash 1.00
be at waste bin 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(gum, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(gum, be at trash)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(gum, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gum, be at waste bin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gum, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(gum, be at waste bin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(gum, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at waste bin)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(gum, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gum, be at waste bin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(gum, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gum, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at trash)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(gum, be at trash) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gum, be at trash)