gum: be at waste bin

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shellac
Weight: 0.44
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate
Weight: 0.34
, candy cane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at waste bin 1.00
be at trash 0.80
be recycle 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(product, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gum, be at waste bin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(product, be recycle)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(product, be recycle)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(product, be recycle)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(gum, be at waste bin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(gum, be at waste bin)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(gum, be at trash)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gum, be at trash)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(gum, be at trash)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at trash)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at waste bin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gum, be at waste bin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(product, be recycle)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(gum, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(product, be recycle)