gymnast: wear makeup

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.76
, performer
Weight: 0.53
, talent
Weight: 0.46
, artist
Weight: 0.40
, friend
Weight: 0.39
Siblings wrestler
Weight: 0.38
, swimmer
Weight: 0.38
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37
, hockey player
Weight: 0.37
, dancer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear makeup 1.00
be requiered wear 0.84
wear scrunchies 0.80
wear pants 0.78
wear socks 0.78
wear shoes 0.78
wear leotards doing 0.78
wear leotards 0.78
wear long leotards 0.77
wear many barrettes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(dancer, wear leotards)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dancer, wear shoes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dancer, wear makeup)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dancer, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(dancer, wear makeup)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dancer, wear shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(dancer, wear shoes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(dancer, wear leotards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(dancer, wear leotards)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(gymnast, wear makeup)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, be requiered wear)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(gymnast, be requiered wear)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(gymnast, be requiered wear)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear leotards doing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(gymnast, be requiered wear)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(gymnast, wear leotards doing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(gymnast, wear leotards doing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(gymnast, wear leotards doing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gymnast, wear makeup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dancer, wear makeup)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dancer, wear shoes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dancer, wear leotards)