gymnast: wear scrunchies on ankles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.76
, performer
Weight: 0.53
, talent
Weight: 0.46
, artist
Weight: 0.40
, friend
Weight: 0.39
Siblings wrestler
Weight: 0.38
, swimmer
Weight: 0.38
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37
, hockey player
Weight: 0.37
, dancer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear scrunchies on ankles 1.00
wear scrunchies 0.94
wear pants 0.86
wear socks 0.85
wear long pants 0.85
wear shoes 0.84
wear barrettes 0.84
wear many barrettes 0.83
wear long leotards 0.83
wear long sleeved leotards 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dancer, wear shoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dancer, wear shoes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(dancer, wear shoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear long pants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(gymnast, wear long pants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(gymnast, wear long pants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gymnast, wear long pants)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear long sleeved leotards)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gymnast, wear long sleeved leotards)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gymnast, wear long sleeved leotards)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(gymnast, wear long sleeved leotards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, wear scrunchies on ankles)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dancer, wear shoes)