habit: has quality prices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.65
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.67
, addiction
Weight: 0.66
, smoking cigarette
Weight: 0.65
, smoking
Weight: 0.65
, eating
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality prices 1.00
has quality bad 0.77
has quality worth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smoking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(smoking cigarette, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(addiction, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(addiction, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(addiction, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(smoking cigarette, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(smoking cigarette, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smoking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(smoking, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(habit, has quality prices)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(habit, has quality worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(habit, has quality worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(habit, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(habit, has quality worth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(habit, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(habit, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(habit, has quality prices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(addiction, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(smoking cigarette, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(smoking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(habit, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)