habitat: be important to agriculture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to agriculture 1.00
be suitable for farming 0.78
important to health 0.76
be important to tourist industries 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(activity, be important to tourist industries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to agriculture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(activity, be important to tourist industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(activity, be important to tourist industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be suitable for farming)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(activity, be important to tourist industries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to agriculture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(grassland, be suitable for farming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(grassland, be suitable for farming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to agriculture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to agriculture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(activity, be important to tourist industries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(grassland, be suitable for farming)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(habitat, be important to agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(activity, be important to tourist industries)