habitat: be with high biodiversity stable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with high biodiversity stable 1.00
be with high biodiversity more stable 0.99
be with biodiversity stable 0.98
be with biodiversity more stable 0.97
be with high biodiversity 0.94
be with biodiversity 0.90
biodiversity division threats 0.81
be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands 0.77
be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands 0.77
upset natural balance of carbon cycle 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(activity, upset natural balance of carbon cycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(activity, upset natural balance of carbon cycle)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(activity, upset natural balance of carbon cycle)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(activity, upset natural balance of carbon cycle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(activity, upset natural balance of carbon cycle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(activity, upset natural balance of carbon cycle)