hacker: break into computer systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
break into computer systems 1.00
break into computers 0.93
gain access to computer systems 0.86
create crack for software 0.78
use virtual machines 0.77
expose bugs in systems 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hacker, break into computer systems)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hacker, gain access to computer systems)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hacker, use virtual machines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hacker, break into computers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hacker, break into computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hacker, break into computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hacker, break into computers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hacker, use virtual machines)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hacker, gain access to computer systems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(hacker, use virtual machines)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hacker, gain access to computer systems)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hacker, gain access to computer systems)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hacker, use virtual machines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hacker, break into computer systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hacker, break into computer systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hacker, break into computer systems)