hacker: break into computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
break into computers 1.00
break into computer systems 0.93
invade computers 0.80
gain access to computer systems 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hacker, break into computers)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hacker, break into computer systems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hacker, gain access to computer systems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hacker, invade computers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hacker, break into computer systems)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hacker, break into computer systems)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hacker, break into computer systems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(hacker, invade computers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hacker, gain access to computer systems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(hacker, invade computers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hacker, gain access to computer systems)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hacker, invade computers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hacker, gain access to computer systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hacker, break into computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(hacker, break into computers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hacker, break into computers)