hacker: commit cyber attacks

Related concepts

Parents	criminal Weight: 0.63 , outsider Weight: 0.63 , person Weight: 0.57 , third party Weight: 0.57 , individual Weight: 0.55
Siblings	spammer Weight: 0.33 , pickpocket Weight: 0.32 , terrorist Weight: 0.32 , thief Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
commit cyber attacks	1.00
do ddos attacks	0.85
use attacks	0.84
attack	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(terrorist, attack)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(terrorist, attack) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(terrorist, attack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(hacker, commit cyber attacks)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(hacker, use attacks)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(hacker, do ddos attacks)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(hacker, do ddos attacks)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(hacker, do ddos attacks)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(hacker, use attacks)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(hacker, do ddos attacks)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(hacker, use attacks)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(hacker, attack)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(hacker, attack)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(hacker, attack)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(hacker, attack)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(hacker, use attacks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(hacker, commit cyber attacks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(hacker, commit cyber attacks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(hacker, commit cyber attacks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(terrorist, attack)