hacker: hack computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hack computer 1.00
hack computers 0.97
hack into computers 0.95
hack instagram 0.94
hack 0.94
hack in to company computers 0.94
hack in to big company computers 0.92
hack phones 0.89
hack movie 0.89
hack games 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computer)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hacker, hack)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack into computers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack phones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack games)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hacker, hack)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hacker, hack games)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hacker, hack into computers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(hacker, hack phones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack games)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack games)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack into computers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hacker, hack into computers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack phones)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hacker, hack phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computer)