hacker: hack databases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hack databases 1.00
hack computers 0.86
hack computer 0.86
hack websites 0.86
hack into computers 0.85
hack in to company computers 0.84
hack email servers 0.84
hack passwords 0.84
hack instagram 0.83
hack 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack databases)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack into computers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack websites)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hacker, hack websites)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hacker, hack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack websites)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hacker, hack websites)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hacker, hack)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hacker, hack into computers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack into computers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hacker, hack into computers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack databases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hacker, hack databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hacker, hack databases)