hacker: hack phones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hack phones 1.00
hack computers 0.91
hack into computers 0.89
hack computer 0.89
hack instagram 0.89
hack 0.89
hack in to company computers 0.88
hack in to big company computers 0.87
hack stuff 0.86
hack games 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(hacker, hack phones)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hacker, hack)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hacker, hack games)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hacker, hack into computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack games)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack into computers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hacker, hack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack games)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hacker, hack into computers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack into computers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack phones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hacker, hack phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hacker, hack phones)