hacker: invade computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
invade computers 1.00
break into computers 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(hacker, invade computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(hacker, invade computers)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hacker, invade computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hacker, break into computers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(hacker, invade computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hacker, break into computers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(hacker, invade computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hacker, break into computers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(hacker, invade computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hacker, break into computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(hacker, invade computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hacker, invade computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hacker, invade computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(hacker, invade computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hacker, invade computers)