hacker: prefer bitcoin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
prefer bitcoin 1.00
prefer linux 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hacker, prefer bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hacker, prefer bitcoin)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(hacker, prefer bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hacker, prefer linux)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(hacker, prefer bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hacker, prefer linux)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hacker, prefer bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hacker, prefer linux)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hacker, prefer bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hacker, prefer linux)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hacker, prefer bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hacker, prefer bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hacker, prefer bitcoin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hacker, prefer bitcoin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hacker, prefer bitcoin)