hacking: is thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.63
, computer network
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, breach
Weight: 0.53
Siblings computer virus
Weight: 0.35
, hack
Weight: 0.33
, stealing
Weight: 0.32
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32
, piracy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is thing 1.00
be thing 0.99
has trait fun 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(stealing, has trait fun)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stealing, is thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(piracy, is thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer virus, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer virus, is thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(piracy, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(piracy, is thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(stealing, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(stealing, is thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(stealing, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(stealing, has trait fun)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(hacking, is thing)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hacking, be thing)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hacking, be thing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hacking, be thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(hacking, be thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hacking, has trait fun)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hacking, has trait fun)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hacking, has trait fun)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hacking, has trait fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hacking, is thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer virus, is thing)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(piracy, is thing)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(stealing, is thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(stealing, has trait fun)