hairdresser: is good job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.61
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.53
Siblings barber
Weight: 0.35
, old woman
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.35
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good job 1.00
has state job 0.91
love job 0.91
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hairdresser, is good job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(barber, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, is good job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(barber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(barber, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hairdresser, is good job)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hairdresser, has state job)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hairdresser, love job)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, has state job)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hairdresser, has state job)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has state job)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, love job)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, love job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hairdresser, love job)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hairdresser, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hairdresser, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hairdresser, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hairdresser, is good job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(barber, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hairdresser, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)