hairdryer: have cold setting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, comfort
Weight: 0.55
, facility
Weight: 0.50
Siblings toaster
Weight: 0.34
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.33
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.33
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.33
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cold setting 1.00
have setting 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(blow dryer, have cold setting)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blow dryer, have setting)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(toaster, have setting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(blow dryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(blow dryer, have cold setting)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(blow dryer, have setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(blow dryer, have setting)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(toaster, have setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(toaster, have setting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(hairdryer, have cold setting)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hairdryer, have setting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hairdryer, have setting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hairdryer, have setting)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hairdryer, have setting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hairdryer, have cold setting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hairdryer, have cold setting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(blow dryer, have setting)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(blow dryer, have cold setting)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hairdryer, have cold setting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(toaster, have setting)