ham: be in hamburger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lunch meat
Weight: 0.69
, cheese
Weight: 0.59
, recipe
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, cream cheese
Weight: 0.34
, salami
Weight: 0.34
, cheddar
Weight: 0.34
, sausage
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hamburger 1.00
is steak 0.82
be greasy pizza 0.81
have sausage dogs 0.79
be called wieners 0.79
is meat 0.78
eat at end of meal 0.78
is breakfast food 0.78
have sausage shaped dogs 0.78
be useful food eat after meal 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cheese, be greasy pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(ham, be in hamburger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(cheese, be greasy pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cheese, be greasy pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sausage, is breakfast food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sausage, be called wieners)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sausage, have sausage shaped dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cheese, be greasy pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ham, be in hamburger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sausage, have sausage shaped dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sausage, have sausage shaped dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sausage, be called wieners) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sausage, be called wieners)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sausage, is breakfast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sausage, is breakfast food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ham, be in hamburger)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ham, is meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ham, is meat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(ham, is meat)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ham, is meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(ham, be in hamburger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cheese, be greasy pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sausage, have sausage shaped dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sausage, be called wieners)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sausage, is breakfast food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(ham, be in hamburger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cheese, be greasy pizza)