ham: be processed meat

Property	Similarity
be processed meat	1.00
is processed meat	1.00
be considered processed meat	0.98
be processed	0.92
is processed	0.92
is meat	0.89
be considered meat	0.87
is beef	0.79
CAN can substituted for meat	0.79
come precooked	0.78

0.85

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(ham, is processed meat)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(ham, is processed meat)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(ham, be considered processed meat)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(ham, be considered processed meat)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(ham, is processed)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(ham, is processed meat)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(ham, be considered processed meat)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(ham, is meat)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ham, be processed)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(ham, is processed)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(ham, be processed)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(ham, be considered meat)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ham, is meat)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(ham, be considered meat)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(ham, be considered processed meat)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(ham, is meat)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(ham, is processed meat)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(ham, is beef)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(ham, is beef)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(ham, is processed)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(ham, be considered meat)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(ham, be processed)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(ham, is beef)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(ham, is meat)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(ham, be processed)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(ham, be considered meat)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(ham, is processed)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(ham, be processed meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(ham, is beef)

Parents	lunch meat Weight: 0.69 , cheese Weight: 0.59 , recipe Weight: 0.58 , staple Weight: 0.58 , favorite Weight: 0.58
Siblings	spaghetti sauce Weight: 0.35 , cream cheese Weight: 0.34 , salami Weight: 0.34 , cheddar Weight: 0.34 , sausage Weight: 0.34

ham: be processed meat

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings