ham: go quickly bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lunch meat
Weight: 0.69
, cheese
Weight: 0.59
, recipe
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, cream cheese
Weight: 0.34
, salami
Weight: 0.34
, cheddar
Weight: 0.34
, sausage
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
go quickly bad 1.00
go bad 0.89
go together good 0.78
go grey 0.77
be good for us 0.77
be bad for body 0.76
has quality bad 0.76
go out of business 0.76
quick 0.76
take long cool 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ham, go quickly bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(staple, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ham, go quickly bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(staple, go out of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(staple, go out of business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cream cheese, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(salami, quick)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sausage, quick)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sausage, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(staple, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sausage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sausage, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(sausage, quick)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sausage, quick)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(salami, quick)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(salami, quick)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cream cheese, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cream cheese, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ham, go quickly bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ham, go grey)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ham, go grey)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(ham, go grey)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ham, go grey)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ham, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ham, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ham, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ham, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ham, go quickly bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(staple, go out of business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cream cheese, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sausage, quick)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sausage, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(salami, quick)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ham, go quickly bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(staple, go out of business)