ham: is fattening

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lunch meat
Weight: 0.69
, cheese
Weight: 0.59
, recipe
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, cream cheese
Weight: 0.34
, salami
Weight: 0.34
, cheddar
Weight: 0.34
, sausage
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fattening 1.00
be high in fat 0.76
is fatty 0.76
has fatness fat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cheese, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ham, is fattening)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cheese, is fattening)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cheese, is fattening)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(salami, has fatness fat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cheese, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(ham, is fattening)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(salami, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(salami, has fatness fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ham, is fattening)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ham, is fattening)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ham, is fattening)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cheese, is fattening)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(salami, has fatness fat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(ham, is fattening)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cheese, is fattening)