hamburger: be common in barcelona

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common in barcelona 1.00
be in europe suck 0.77
be popular in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be popular in america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pizza, be popular in america)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pizza, be popular in america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(hamburger, be common in barcelona)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be in europe suck)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hamburger, be in europe suck)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be in europe suck)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hamburger, be in europe suck)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be popular in america)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hamburger, be popular in america)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hamburger, be popular in america)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be popular in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be common in barcelona)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hamburger, be common in barcelona)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be common in barcelona)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pizza, be popular in america)