hamburger: be for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for dogs 1.00
be better than dogs 0.91
be better than hot dogs 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hamburger, be for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hamburger, be for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hamburger, be for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than hot dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hamburger, be for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hamburger, be better than hot dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hamburger, be for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than hot dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(hamburger, be for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than hot dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hamburger, be for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hamburger, be for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(hamburger, be for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hamburger, be for dogs)