hamburger: have less energy than steak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have less energy than steak 1.00
have lower energy than steak 0.97
be better than pizza 0.81
be called beef burgers 0.80
is meat 0.77
is lower energy 0.77
be better than cheeseburgers 0.77
be better than hot dogs 0.76
is meat red 0.76
be called hamburger 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hamburger, is meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hamburger, is meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hamburger, be called hamburger)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is meat red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hamburger, is meat red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hamburger, be better than hot dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is meat red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than hot dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than hot dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than cheeseburgers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hamburger, is meat red)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hamburger, be better than cheeseburgers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than hot dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be called hamburger)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than cheeseburgers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than cheeseburgers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hamburger, be called hamburger)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be called hamburger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)