hamburger: have lower energy than steak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have lower energy than steak 1.00
have less energy than steak 0.97
is lower energy 0.85
be better than pizza 0.80
be called beef burgers 0.79
is meat 0.77
is meat red 0.76
be better than cheeseburgers 0.76
be called hamburger 0.75
taste better in restaurants 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hamburger, is meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is meat red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hamburger, is meat red)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hamburger, is meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than cheeseburgers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is meat red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hamburger, be called hamburger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hamburger, be better than cheeseburgers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be called hamburger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be called hamburger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than cheeseburgers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hamburger, is meat red)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hamburger, be called hamburger)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than cheeseburgers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be called beef burgers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hamburger, be called beef burgers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)