hamburger: have well done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have well done 1.00
is well done 0.99
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hamburger, have well done)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hamburger, have well done)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sausage, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hamburger, have well done)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hamburger, have well done)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hamburger, have well done)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sausage, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sausage, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sausage, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(meat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have well done)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cheeseburger, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hamburger, have well done)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hamburger, is well done)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is well done)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hamburger, is well done)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is well done)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hamburger, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hamburger, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hamburger, have well done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sausage, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sausage, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(hamburger, have well done)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)