hamburger: taste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.72
, meal
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.67
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.66
, sausage
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cheeseburger
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, pizza
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste 1.00
taste in space 0.88
taste better in space 0.86
taste better in restaurants 0.84
taste in outer space 0.78
taste better in outer space 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pizza, taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pizza, taste)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pizza, taste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(hamburger, taste)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hamburger, taste better in outer space)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hamburger, taste better in outer space)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in outer space)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hamburger, taste in outer space)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hamburger, taste in outer space)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste in outer space)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hamburger, taste better in outer space)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hamburger, taste in outer space)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hamburger, taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pizza, taste)