hamburger: taste better in restaurants

Property	Similarity
taste better in restaurants	1.00
taste	0.84
taste better in space	0.84
taste in space	0.80
be better than pizza	0.80
taste better in outer space	0.78
have less energy than steak	0.76
have lower energy than steak	0.75
be called beef burgers	0.75

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(hamburger, taste better in outer space)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in outer space)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(hamburger, taste better in outer space)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(hamburger, taste better in outer space)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(hamburger, be better than pizza)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than pizza)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than pizza)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(hamburger, taste)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(hamburger, taste)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have less energy than steak)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(hamburger, have less energy than steak)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(hamburger, taste)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(hamburger, taste)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(hamburger, have less energy than steak)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(hamburger, have less energy than steak)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(hamburger, be called beef burgers)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be called beef burgers)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have lower energy than steak)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(hamburger, be called beef burgers)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(hamburger, taste better in restaurants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(hamburger, be called beef burgers)

Parents	meat Weight: 0.72 , meal Weight: 0.71 , food Weight: 0.67 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.66 , sausage Weight: 0.65
Siblings	cheeseburger Weight: 0.38 , sandwich Weight: 0.37 , pizza Weight: 0.37

hamburger: taste better in restaurants

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings