hamster: be better than rats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet
Weight: 0.74
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cat
Weight: 0.38
, kitten
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than rats 1.00
is rodent 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(guinea pig, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hamster, be better than rats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is rodent)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is rodent)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(guinea pig, is rodent)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hamster, be better than rats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hamster, be better than rats)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hamster, is rodent)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hamster, is rodent)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hamster, is rodent)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(hamster, is rodent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hamster, be better than rats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hamster, be better than rats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is rodent)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hamster, be better than rats)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is rodent)