hamstring: be important in sprinting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.68
, muscle
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.53
, tendon
Weight: 0.53
, leg
Weight: 0.47
Siblings achilles tendon
Weight: 0.39
, knee
Weight: 0.39
, ankle
Weight: 0.37
, groin
Weight: 0.37
, ligament
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in sprinting 1.00
be in sprinting 0.98
be important in running 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(knee, be important in sprinting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(knee, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(knee, be important in sprinting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(hamstring, be important in sprinting)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hamstring, be in sprinting)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(hamstring, be in sprinting)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hamstring, be in sprinting)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, be in sprinting)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, be important in running)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hamstring, be important in running)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hamstring, be important in running)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(hamstring, be important in running)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, be important in sprinting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hamstring, be important in sprinting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, be important in sprinting)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(knee, be important in sprinting)