hamstring: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.68
, muscle
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.53
, tendon
Weight: 0.53
, leg
Weight: 0.47
Siblings achilles tendon
Weight: 0.39
, knee
Weight: 0.39
, ankle
Weight: 0.37
, groin
Weight: 0.37
, ligament
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state sore 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(achilles tendon, has state sore)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ankle, has state sore)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(groin, has state sore)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(groin, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(groin, has state sore)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ankle, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ankle, has state sore)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(achilles tendon, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(achilles tendon, has state sore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(hamstring, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state sore)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hamstring, has state sore)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hamstring, has state sore)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hamstring, has state sore)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hamstring, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(groin, has state sore)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(achilles tendon, has state sore)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ankle, has state sore)