happy hour: be illegal in ma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.69
, event
Weight: 0.66
, time
Weight: 0.63
, opportunity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings time out
Weight: 0.35
, free time
Weight: 0.35
, nice
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in ma 1.00
is illegal 0.81
be illegal in massachusetts 0.80
be illegal in nc 0.79
be illegal in carolina 0.79
be illegal in boston 0.79
be illegal in north carolina 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(happy hour, be illegal in ma)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(happy hour, is illegal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(happy hour, is illegal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(happy hour, be illegal in massachusetts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in massachusetts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in massachusetts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(happy hour, be illegal in nc)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in nc)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in nc)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(happy hour, be illegal in carolina)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in carolina)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in carolina)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in boston)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(happy hour, be illegal in boston)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in boston)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(happy hour, be illegal in north carolina)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in north carolina)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in north carolina)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(happy hour, is illegal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(happy hour, be illegal in nc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(happy hour, be illegal in massachusetts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(happy hour, be illegal in carolina)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(happy hour, be illegal in boston)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(happy hour, be illegal in north carolina)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(happy hour, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(happy hour, be illegal in ma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(happy hour, be illegal in ma)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(happy hour, be illegal in ma)