hard drive: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk drive
Weight: 0.79
, drive
Weight: 0.78
, computer disk
Weight: 0.68
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.67
Siblings floppy disk
Weight: 0.66
, save
Weight: 0.52
, flash memory
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
go 0.87
has quality bad 0.79
do clickitty 0.78
do clickitty clickitty 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hard drive, go bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hard drive, go bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(drive, go)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hard drive, go bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(disk drive, do clickitty clickitty)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hard drive, go bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(disk drive, do clickitty)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hard drive, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(drive, go)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(drive, go bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(disk drive, do clickitty)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(disk drive, do clickitty clickitty)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(drive, go bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(drive, go)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(disk drive, do clickitty)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(disk drive, do clickitty clickitty)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(floppy disk, go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(drive, go)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(disk drive, do clickitty clickitty)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(disk drive, do clickitty)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hard drive, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(floppy disk, go bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(floppy disk, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(hard drive, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hard drive, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(drive, go bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(drive, go)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(disk drive, do clickitty)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(disk drive, do clickitty clickitty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(floppy disk, go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(drive, go)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(disk drive, do clickitty)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(drive, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(disk drive, do clickitty clickitty)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hard drive, go bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality bad)