hard drive: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk drive
Weight: 0.79
, drive
Weight: 0.78
, computer disk
Weight: 0.68
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.67
Siblings floppy disk
Weight: 0.66
, save
Weight: 0.52
, flash memory
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality full 0.84
is well liked 0.77
is lot cheap 0.76
get good reviews 0.75
has state lot 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(disk drive, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drive, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(drive, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(disk drive, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drive, has quality full)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(disk drive, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality full)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(save, has state lot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(save, is lot cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(disk drive, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(disk drive, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drive, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(flash memory, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(flash memory, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(save, has state lot)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(save, has state lot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(save, is lot cheap)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(save, is lot cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(hard drive, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality full)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(hard drive, has quality full)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drive, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, has quality full)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(flash memory, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(save, has state lot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(save, is lot cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drive, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(disk drive, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(hard drive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, has quality full)