hard drive: need defragmenting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk drive
Weight: 0.79
, drive
Weight: 0.78
, computer disk
Weight: 0.68
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.67
Siblings floppy disk
Weight: 0.66
, save
Weight: 0.52
, flash memory
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need defragmenting 1.00
be called hard disk 0.79
be called disk 0.78
need formatting 0.77
be more expensive than desktop computers 0.75
cost more than desktop computers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(drive, be called hard disk)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(drive, need formatting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drive, be called hard disk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hard drive, need defragmenting)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hard drive, be called hard disk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hard drive, be called disk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be called disk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be called hard disk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(hard drive, be called disk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(hard drive, need formatting)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be called disk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(hard drive, be called hard disk)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be called hard disk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drive, need defragmenting)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drive, be called hard disk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(drive, need formatting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drive, need defragmenting)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drive, be called hard disk)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(drive, need formatting)