hardness: be important in engineering

Related concepts

Parents	characteristic Weight: 0.67 , factor Weight: 0.63 , parameter Weight: 0.63 , quality Weight: 0.61 , variable Weight: 0.56
Siblings	tensile strength Weight: 0.36 , viscosity Weight: 0.35 , texture Weight: 0.35 , toughness Weight: 0.34 , modulus Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in engineering	1.00
be important in design	0.84
be important in science	0.80
be important to science	0.79
be important in field of science	0.77
be important in interior design	0.77
be important in research	0.76
be important in manufacturing	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(hardness, be important in engineering)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(hardness, be important in engineering)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(variable, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(hardness, be important in engineering)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(hardness, be important in engineering)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(hardness, be important in engineering)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(variable, be important in science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(variable, be important to science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(variable, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in manufacturing)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be important in field of science)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(variable, be important to science)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in science)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(toughness, be important in engineering)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(texture, be important in design)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(texture, be important in interior design)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(variable, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(variable, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(characteristic, be important in field of science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(toughness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(toughness, be important in engineering)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(tensile strength, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(tensile strength, be important in engineering)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(texture, be important in design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(texture, be important in design)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(texture, be important in interior design) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(texture, be important in interior design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(hardness, be important in engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(hardness, be important in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(quality, be important in manufacturing)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(characteristic, be important in field of science)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(variable, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(toughness, be important in engineering)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tensile strength, be important in engineering)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(texture, be important in design)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(texture, be important in interior design)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(quality, be important in manufacturing)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(characteristic, be important in field of science)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(hardness, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(variable, be important in research)