hardware store: be at oregon

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents department store
Weight: 0.81
, convenience store
Weight: 0.77
, store
Weight: 0.75
, shop
Weight: 0.70
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.82
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, shoe store
Weight: 0.38
, gift shop
Weight: 0.37
, supermarket
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at oregon 1.00
be at saginaw michigan 0.83
be at michigan 0.83
be at florida 0.82
be at idaho 0.80
be at texas 0.79
be at washington 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(department store, be at idaho)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hardware store, be at oregon)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(store, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hardware store, be at oregon)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(store, be at texas)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(department store, be at idaho)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(department store, be at idaho)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(store, be at texas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at saginaw michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at michigan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(department store, be at idaho)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(store, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(food store, be at saginaw michigan)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(food store, be at saginaw michigan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(food store, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(food store, be at michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(hardware store, be at oregon)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hardware store, be at washington)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hardware store, be at washington)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(hardware store, be at washington)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at washington)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hardware store, be at oregon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(department store, be at idaho)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(store, be at texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(food store, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(food store, be at saginaw michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(department store, be at idaho)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hardware store, be at oregon)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(store, be at texas)