hardware: needs software work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.64
, operating system
Weight: 0.64
, engineering
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.59
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
Siblings software
Weight: 0.35
, electronics
Weight: 0.34
, unix
Weight: 0.33
, solaris
Weight: 0.33
, macintosh
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
needs software work 1.00
make software work 0.90
is software 0.87
be called software 0.86
work with application software 0.86
be more important than software 0.85
needs quality product 0.84
run software 0.84
understand software 0.83
be needed in computer system 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(operating system, is software)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, needs software work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(operating system, work with application software)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, needs software work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(operating system, be needed in computer system)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, needs software work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(operating system, is software)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(operating system, work with application software)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(operating system, be needed in computer system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be needed in computer system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(operating system, work with application software)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is software)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(software, needs quality product)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(software, be called software)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(operating system, is software)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(operating system, work with application software)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(operating system, be needed in computer system)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hardware, needs software work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(software, be called software)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(software, be called software)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(software, needs quality product)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(software, needs quality product)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hardware, needs software work)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hardware, make software work)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hardware, make software work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hardware, be more important than software)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hardware, make software work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hardware, run software)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hardware, understand software)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hardware, run software)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hardware, understand software)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hardware, make software work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hardware, run software)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hardware, run software)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hardware, understand software)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hardware, understand software)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hardware, be more important than software)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hardware, be more important than software)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardware, be more important than software)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hardware, needs software work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(operating system, is software)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(operating system, work with application software)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(operating system, be needed in computer system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(software, be called software)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(software, needs quality product)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(operating system, is software)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(operating system, work with application software)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hardware, needs software work)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(operating system, be needed in computer system)