harlem: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neighborhood
Weight: 0.62
, new york city
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
, ghetto
Weight: 0.55
, community
Weight: 0.49
Siblings new york
Weight: 0.35
, albany
Weight: 0.34
, brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.34
, brooklyn
Weight: 0.33
, venice
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
was good place for harlem renaissance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new york, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(new york, is great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(harlem, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(harlem, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(harlem, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(harlem, is great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, is great)