harlem: was good place for harlem renaissance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neighborhood
Weight: 0.62
, new york city
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
, ghetto
Weight: 0.55
, community
Weight: 0.49
Siblings new york
Weight: 0.35
, albany
Weight: 0.34
, brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.34
, brooklyn
Weight: 0.33
, venice
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good place for harlem renaissance 1.00
was selected for harlem renaissance 0.92
was center of renaissance 0.87
was center of american renaissance 0.87
was center of african renaissance 0.86
was center of african american renaissance 0.83
be called harlem 0.79
be named harlem 0.78
is great 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new york, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(new york, is great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(harlem, was selected for harlem renaissance)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(harlem, was center of american renaissance)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(harlem, was center of renaissance)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(harlem, was center of african renaissance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(harlem, was selected for harlem renaissance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(harlem, was center of renaissance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(harlem, was center of american renaissance)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(harlem, was center of renaissance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(harlem, was selected for harlem renaissance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(harlem, was center of american renaissance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(harlem, was center of african renaissance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(harlem, was center of african american renaissance)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(harlem, be called harlem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(harlem, was center of african renaissance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(harlem, be named harlem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(harlem, be called harlem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(harlem, be called harlem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was center of american renaissance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(harlem, was center of african american renaissance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(harlem, be named harlem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was selected for harlem renaissance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(harlem, was center of african american renaissance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(harlem, be named harlem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was center of renaissance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(harlem, is great)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was center of african renaissance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was center of african american renaissance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(harlem, is great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(harlem, is great)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(harlem, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(harlem, be called harlem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(harlem, be named harlem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(harlem, was good place for harlem renaissance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, is great)