:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(shop, is uk)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(harrods, be in london)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(name, is uk)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(harrods, be in london)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(harrods, be in london)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(name, is uk)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(harrods, be in london)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(shop, is uk)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be in london)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(name, is uk)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be in london)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(shop, is uk)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be in london)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shop, is uk)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be in london)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(name, is uk)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child