harrods: be in london located

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.55
, department store
Weight: 0.49
, name
Weight: 0.45
, shop
Weight: 0.42
, place
Weight: 0.38
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.28
, grocery store
Weight: 0.28
, clothing store
Weight: 0.28
, hardware store
Weight: 0.28
, home depot
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in london located 1.00
be in london 0.93
be on on london 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(department store, be in london)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(harrods, be in london located)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(department store, be in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(department store, be in london)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(department store, be in london)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(harrods, be in london located)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(harrods, be in london located)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(harrods, be in london)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be in london)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be on on london)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(harrods, be in london)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(harrods, be on on london)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(harrods, be in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(harrods, be on on london)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(harrods, be on on london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be in london located)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(harrods, be in london located)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(department store, be in london)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(harrods, be in london located)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(department store, be in london)