harrods: has state jobs

Related concepts

Parents	store Weight: 0.55 , department store Weight: 0.49 , name Weight: 0.45 , shop Weight: 0.42 , place Weight: 0.38
Siblings	convenience store Weight: 0.28 , grocery store Weight: 0.28 , clothing store Weight: 0.28 , hardware store Weight: 0.28 , home depot Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state jobs	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(harrods, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(home depot, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(harrods, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(home depot, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(home depot, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(harrods, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(harrods, has state jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(harrods, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(harrods, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(harrods, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(harrods, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(harrods, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(harrods, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(home depot, has state jobs)