hastings: is map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.45
, character
Weight: 0.44
, city
Weight: 0.44
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.35
, norfolk
Weight: 0.34
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.34
, robert louis stevenson
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is map 1.00
is zip code map 0.86
is england map 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(city, is map)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hastings, is map)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(city, is map)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(city, is map)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(city, is map)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hastings, is map)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(hastings, is map)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hastings, is zip code map)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hastings, is england map)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hastings, is zip code map)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hastings, is england map)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hastings, is zip code map)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hastings, is england map)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(hastings, is england map)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hastings, is zip code map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hastings, is map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hastings, is map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(city, is map)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hastings, is map)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(city, is map)