hat trick: be in hockey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, term
Weight: 0.55
, game
Weight: 0.54
, goal
Weight: 0.54
Siblings sweater
Weight: 0.32
, black magic
Weight: 0.32
, clown
Weight: 0.32
, joke
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hockey 1.00
be called football 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(goal, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat trick, be in hockey)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(goal, be in hockey)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(goal, be in hockey)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(goal, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(hat trick, be in hockey)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hat trick, be in hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hat trick, be called football)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hat trick, be called football)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hat trick, be called football)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hat trick, be called football)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hat trick, be in hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat trick, be in hockey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(goal, be in hockey)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hat trick, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(goal, be in hockey)