hat: have in holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prop
Weight: 0.61
, bag
Weight: 0.59
, shirt
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sweatshirt
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33
, trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, sweater
Weight: 0.33
, towel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have in holes 1.00
have holes in top 0.94
has physical part holes 0.93
have thumb holes 0.84
be made with thumb holes 0.84
get holes in armpit 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shirt, be made with thumb holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat, have in holes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shirt, have thumb holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat, have in holes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(shirt, get holes in armpit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat, have in holes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(shirt, get holes in armpit)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(shirt, have thumb holes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shirt, be made with thumb holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(shirt, get holes in armpit)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shirt, have thumb holes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shirt, be made with thumb holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sweater, have thumb holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sweatshirt, have thumb holes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shirt, be made with thumb holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hat, have in holes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shirt, have thumb holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hat, have in holes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(shirt, get holes in armpit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hat, have in holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sweater, have thumb holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(sweater, have thumb holes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sweatshirt, have thumb holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sweatshirt, have thumb holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hat, have in holes)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hat, have holes in top)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has physical part holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hat, has physical part holes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(hat, has physical part holes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hat, have holes in top)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hat, has physical part holes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hat, have holes in top)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hat, have holes in top)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat, have in holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(shirt, get holes in armpit)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(shirt, have thumb holes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shirt, be made with thumb holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(sweater, have thumb holes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sweatshirt, have thumb holes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(shirt, get holes in armpit)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(shirt, have thumb holes)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hat, have in holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shirt, be made with thumb holes)