haze: be in colorado springs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, dust storm
Weight: 0.52
, game
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.47
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.32
, smog
Weight: 0.32
, mist
Weight: 0.31
, smell
Weight: 0.31
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in colorado springs 1.00
be in minnesota 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(haze, be in colorado springs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(haze, be in colorado springs)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(haze, be in colorado springs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(haze, be in minnesota)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(haze, be in colorado springs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(haze, be in minnesota)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(haze, be in colorado springs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(haze, be in minnesota)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(haze, be in colorado springs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(haze, be in minnesota)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(haze, be in colorado springs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(haze, be in colorado springs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(haze, be in colorado springs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(haze, be in colorado springs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(haze, be in colorado springs)